Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is a bit better than Galaxy A6, with a 76.1 score against 75.8. The Moto G Power body is newer than Galaxy A6's, but it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Moto G Power also has more RAM memory.
Moto G Power counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit larger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 1080 x 2300px resolution. The Moto G Power counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A6, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto G Power takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a 0.36 inches sensor, the same aperture and a camera with a 16 mega-pixels, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a lot higher video resolution.
Although Moto G Power is a better device, it costs more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A6, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.