Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's score of 76.1. The Galaxy A70 body is a bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power, although it was released about a year before. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A70 has older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A70 counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Motorola Moto G Power, because although the Galaxy A70 has a little bit worse number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has more RAM. Moto G Power captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same back camera sensor size and the same video resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.