Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Smoke black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is much better than Moto G Power, getting an 85.2 score against 76.1. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Samsung Galaxy F41's body is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto G Power, even though both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit sharper screen than Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little greater screen density. Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy F41 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 features as much storage to install games and applications as Motorola Moto G Power, both have equal 64 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has better battery life than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.