Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Smoke black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy F62 is a bit heavier than Moto G Power, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. Both devices in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Galaxy F62 features a little faster processing unit than Moto G Power, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy F62 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Power, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery performance than Moto G Power, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.