Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Smoke black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Moto G Power, with a 97.6 score against 76.1. Even though Galaxy Fold and the Moto G Power were only released 7 months apart, the Galaxy Fold design is way heavier but thinner. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Power has Android 11, so it offers some extra features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G Power and Galaxy Fold both feature extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a little lower pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Moto G Power has a little longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better low light photography.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G Power, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.