Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Smoke black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit better than the Moto G Power, with a global score of 78.9 against 76.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M20 is older than Moto G Power, it's construction is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M20 has 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
Galaxy M20 has a screen that's just as good as the Motorola Moto G Power one, because although the Galaxy M20 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels count in each display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy M20 and Moto G Power both have very similar storage capacity to install games and applications, both have the same 64 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Power features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M20. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy M20's battery performance is very similar to Motorola Moto G Power's battery lifetime. The Moto G Power shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a way better video definition, a higher resolution camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.