Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Smoke black | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M21 is better than Moto G Power, with a overall score of 84.1 against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy M21 is a just a little lighter and a bit thinner device than Moto G Power, even though both were released only 1 months apart. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user the same OS features.
The Galaxy M21 has a bit better looking screen than Moto G Power, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy M21 also has a bit greater pixels number per inch of screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Galaxy M21 features a little bit better processing power than Moto G Power. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy M21 has a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M21 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy M21 has as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola Moto G Power one, they have equal internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M21 counts with superior battery performance than Moto G Power, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.