Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Smoke black | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has a general score of 85, which is better than the Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M40 has the previous 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that Galaxy M40 is older than Moto G Power, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter.
Galaxy M40 counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy M40 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M40 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Power has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Galaxy M40 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Galaxy M40 also has a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.