Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than Moto G Power, getting an 87.7 score against 76.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy M51 and the Moto G Power were released with only 5 months difference, Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is just a bit heavier but a bit thinner than the Moto G Power. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy M51 has a screen that is just as good as Moto G Power's display, because although the Galaxy M51 has a little lower pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.