Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Smoke black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter device than the Moto G Power, although they were released only 4 months apart. Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a lot larger camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures.
The Moto G Power has a better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Power counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.