Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than Moto G Power, getting a score of 81.2 against 76.1. Galaxy Note 3 is an notably older phone than the Moto G Power, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 3 features a better screen than Moto G Power, although it has a little bit lower display density, a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Moto G Power counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Power also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a larger camera sensor, a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a lot larger camera aperture.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Moto G Power, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.