Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than Moto G Power's score of 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an much older phone than Moto G Power, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto G Power features a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Power also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Motorola Moto G Power has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.