Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than Moto G Power, with a 77.7 score against 76.1. The Galaxy Note3 construction is thinner and lighter than the Moto G Power, even though it was released 7 years before. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note3 has newer 4.4.2 version while Moto G Power has Android 11, so it counts with some additional features and improved performance.
The Motorola Moto G Power has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit better pixels density, a quite better 1080 x 2300 resolution and a bit larger display. Moto G Power has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G Power also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Power counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (although slower). Moto G Power has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power also has a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs, a lot larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
The Moto G Power counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.