Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 is a little bit better than the Moto G Power, having a global score of 77.6 against 76.1. Galaxy Note4's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Moto G Power features a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G Power also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note4 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixels density. Moto G Power counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Power shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photos, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution back facing camera, the Moto G Power also counts with a way bigger camera aperture.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 55 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.