Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 construction is lighter and notably thinner than the Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G Power. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Moto G Power counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G Power also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Power and Galaxy Note5 both count with extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Note5 has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a back facing camera with a 16 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
The Moto G Power counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.