Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a 79.5 score against 76.1. Although Samsung Galaxy Note7 is notably older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Galaxy Note7 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto G Power has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Power also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a greater number of cores (but slower).
The Motorola Moto G Power features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
Motorola Moto G Power features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.