Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Smoke black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting an 88.3 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10 body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released only 13 months before. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy S10 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a better screen density. The Galaxy S10 takes clearer photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better low light photos.
Galaxy S10 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Power counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.