Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Smoke black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is way better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Although Galaxy S10 5G is older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's construction is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G Power, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a much lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.