Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 150.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a general score of 89.7 against 76.1. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner device than Motorola Moto G Power, although both were released only a couple months apart. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little faster processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, faster video frame rates and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Power features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a lot more than Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.