Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Smoke black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting an 86.3 score against 76.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S10e is older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's design is thinner and incredibly lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Galaxy S10e counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10e has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
The Moto G Power features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S10e, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Power, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.