Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Smoke black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Moto G Power, having a overall score of 98 against 76.1. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is a little thinner but somewhat heavier than Moto G Power, and they were released with only a couple of months difference.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a greater display pixel density, a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a much bigger sensor and a much higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto G Power.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.