Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is better than the Moto G Power, having an 89.1 score against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's body is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Power. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy S21 FE has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S21 FE features a bit sharper screen than Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little better amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G Power counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G Power also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a much better 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto G Power features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S21 FE, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Power, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.