Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Smoke black | Phantom black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a global score of 98.1, which is way better than the Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra's design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Moto G Power.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Moto G Power, because it has a quite bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better count of pixels per inch in the display.
Moto G Power counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a battery duration that's just as good as Moto G Power's battery performance.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Although Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.