Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Smoke black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than Moto G Power's score of 76.1. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Moto G Power has Android 11. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is somewhat heavier than the Moto G Power, it's a little bit thinner and also newer.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a little larger display.
The Moto G Power features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra have very similar batteries performance.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher video resolution and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.