Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Galaxy S25's design is a lot thinner and much lighter than Motorola Moto G Power. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11, so it gives you a couple additional features and improved performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Moto G Power counts with a very superior performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto G Power has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a way larger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Power, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.