Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Moto G Power, getting a 90.7 score against 76.1. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and lighter cellphone than the Moto G Power. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Moto G Power, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G Power counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery duration is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Power one. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much higher resolution camera in the back, a much larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.