Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S4 has a global score of 76.1, which is slightly better than Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S4 has the newer 4.4.2 version and Moto G Power has Android 11, offering a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S4 is an older phone than the Moto G Power, but it is incredibly lighter and thinner anyway.
Galaxy S4 has a better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G Power features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G Power counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S4, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S4, because it has a 92 percent larger battery capacity.
Moto G Power takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S4, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger aperture for better images and videos in low light situations, a higher 16 MP resolution camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S4 is also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.