Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power, having a score of 80.9 against 76.1. The Galaxy S6 Active design is incredibly lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a much sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. Moto G Power features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S6 Active features a more powerful CPU than Moto G Power, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. Moto G Power has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Moto G Power has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 16 mega pixels camera and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Power also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
Although Galaxy S6 Active is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S6 Active, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Power, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.