Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Smoke black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Power has a score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Motorola Moto G Power's construction is much newer and a little bit thinner, but also just a little heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto G Power features a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Moto G Power counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G Power also has 4 more CPU cores (although they are slower).
The Moto G Power counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels. The Moto G Power has longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola Moto G Power is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.