Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Smoke black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. The Galaxy Z Flip is a a bit lighter and thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a bit higher pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a back camera with a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Power, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.