Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Smoke black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is better than Motorola Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a quite bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a bit higher display pixels density. The Moto G Power shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger aperture for better images in poorly lited situations and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Moto G Power counts with more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G Power, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.