Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Smoke black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 150.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting a general score of 92.3 against 76.1. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is way thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G Power, even when both of them were only released 4 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little sharper screen than Moto G Power, because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little higher pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Moto G Power features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent more battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, a camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.