Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a score of 79, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. These phones include Android OS, but Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11, giving a couple additional features and performance enhancements. Despite of the fact Xperia XZ2 Compact is way older and thicker than the Motorola Moto G Power, it's body is still lighter.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little better screen pixel density. Moto G Power counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G Power also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate, a back facing camera with more megapixels and a bigger camera sensor.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.