Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZs is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a overall score of 77.2 against 76.1. Despite of the fact that Xperia XZs is much older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Sony Xperia XZs counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Moto G Power features a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G Power also has more cores (but slower). The Xperia XZs has a much better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, faster video frame rates and a higher resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G Power has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Power features a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Power, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.