Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's construction is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released around 12 months before.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little sharper screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite better display density.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes better photographs and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power features a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.