Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Smoke black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Moto G Power's score of 76.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a a little thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than the Moto G Power, even though they were only released with a couple months difference.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a bit better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and higher video frame rates.
Moto G Power has a better storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with improved battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.