Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Smoke black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power's score of 76.1. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and the Motorola Moto G Power were released with only 1 months difference, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is a little bit heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Moto G Power counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.