Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Smoke black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Even though Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and the Moto G Power were released with only a couple months difference, Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's construction is just a bit thinner but just a bit heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has older 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Moto G Power has a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Power, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots greater photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.