Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 score. The iPhone X design is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Moto G Stylus (2021), although it was released 3 years before. The Apple iPhone X counts with a better processing power than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has lesser RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436. Moto G Stylus (2021) features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G Stylus (2021) captures just a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Stylus (2021). If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Stylus (2021), and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.