Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, having a score of 79.3 against 78.8. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s design is newer, but a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 3a. Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.