Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Moto G Stylus (2021), getting an 81.3 score against 79.3. LG V35 ThinQ is an incredibly older device than Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater screen pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus (2021) features superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% bigger battery size. Moto G Stylus (2021) takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.