Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus (2021) has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Moto G Stylus (2021) is a newer phone, and it is also a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a quite smaller screen, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit inferior pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.