Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), with a 79.9 score against 79.3. Galaxy A25 5G's design is a lot newer, just a little lighter and just a little thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better display density.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better camera than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a higher resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with superior battery performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.