Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), with a global score of 83.8 against 79.3. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50 is older than the Moto G Stylus (2021), it's body is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A50's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Moto G Stylus (2021) one, both of them have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal memory capacity. Moto G Stylus (2021) and Galaxy A50 have similar batteries duration.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.