Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is better than Moto G Stylus (2021), having a general score of 90.8 against 79.3. Galaxy A51 5G's design is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), even when both were released only a couple of months apart. The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a bit better pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same resolution back facing camera and the same video frame rate.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs a bit more than Moto G Stylus (2021), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.