Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s score of 79.3. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 and Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) were only released 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A52 is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a little better pixels amount per inch of display.
Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little better battery performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a better camera than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.