Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus (2021)'s global score of 79.3. Even when the Galaxy A52 5G and the Moto G Stylus (2021) were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy A52 5G is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.