Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), having a 92.9 score against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than the Moto G Stylus (2021), although both of them were released only 6 months apart. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a just a little higher pixels count in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots better videos and photos than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.