Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s overall score of 79.3. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body is lighter and thinner than the Moto G Stylus (2021), even though it was released many years before. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little better performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) and Moto G Stylus (2021) both count with really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a lot more MP camera.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features as much memory for applications and games as the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) one, both of them have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal memory. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.