Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Galaxy F62 features a little faster CPU than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has less cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a little higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.